Anyone organising a public viewing in Switzerland during the World Cup in Russia requires a separate licence under certain conditions. FIFA will lose out.
In principle, advertising in Switzerland may refer to major events, even if the promoted provider is neither an organizer nor a sponsor. However, advertisers must observe a number of rules when using such associations.
The planned revision of copyright law is intended to offer right holders more effective tools against online piracy. To this end, the law applies to hosting providers and creates a legal basis for the processing of personal data by rights holders.
The Swiss Federal Supreme Court reduces the requirement for the legal interest in a declaratory judgment in an international context and thereby allows proceedings to be moved to Switzerland by means of actions for negative declaration.
Letzte Woche wurde publik, dass die UBS nach ausländischen nun auch von bestimmten Schweizer Kunden einen Nachweis verlangt, wonach ihre Gelder korrekt versteuert sind. Auch andere Banken haben solche Nachweispflichten für Schweizer Kunden bereits eingeführt oder stehen kurz davor.
Our series "Online Enforcement" deals with particularities in the enforcement of rights on the Internet.
In the case of online infringements, content removal regularly has priority for the rights holder. Swiss industry standards enable hosting providers to block access to their customers' infringing content.
Our series "Online enforcement" deals with particularities in the enforcement of rights on the Internet.
The identification of the person responsible for an online infringement is a major challenge for the rights owner. Proxy services and the EU General Data Protection Regulation restrict the information available on domain holders in the WHOIS directory and make enforcement more difficult.
The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will apply from May 25, 2018. The more stringent requirements for the handling of personal data will also apply to data processing by the numerous Swiss companies that target the EU end customer market or whose data processing in some other way falls within the (intended) broad scope of the GDPR. The somewhat ambiguous wording and the complexity of the GDPR favor myths and misconceptions. Some of them also find their way into publications and recommendations of advisors. In this blog post , we highlight ten myths we encounter in our practice (namely in the context of ongoing GDPR compliance projects for Swiss companies) and clarify the corresponding misconceptions.
Schedule of claims – What is it all about?
Once bankruptcy proceedings have been opened over a debtor, the bankruptcy administration must prepare an inventory to determine the extent of the bankruptcy estate. By means of public notice, the creditors and debtors of the bankrupt are requested to come forward (so-called call for claims). Within one month, the creditors must file their claims or other demands against the bankrupt with the bankruptcy administration. Subsequently, the bankruptcy administration draws up a list of claims.
The bankruptcy administration checks the registered claims and decides whether it recognizes them and, if so, in what amount and rank. Based on these decisions, it draws up the schedule of claims. It is a schedule showing the order in which the claims of the various creditors should be satisfied. The rejected demands are also marked on the schedule of claims, together with the reason for the rejection.